Sunday 19 February 2012

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

I asked for this for Christmas, with the aim in mind of reading all of the Brontë novels before 2013. What I didn't know at the time is that this is considered to be one of the first unapologetically feminist novels. There's a scene where the protagonist, Helen Huntingdon, slams a door in her husband's face. Victorian society had a huge hissy fit about this, with Sharpe's magazine managing to expectorate, between outraged gasps, that the book was not "fit subject matter ... to be obtruded by every circulating library-keeper upon the notice of our sisters, wives, and daughters."

In brief: the book is an epistolary novel, told in the form of Gilbert Markham's letters about how he met the mysterious tenant of a nearby property, Helen Graham. Gilbert, being a lead man in Regency novel, is of course a single man in possesion of good fortune and desperately in want of a leading lady. Forgetting quickly about a ringletted vicar's daughter who he's been sniffing around for the sake of narrative, he promptly falls in love with the dark-eyed, watercolour-painting widow, who rents a few dark rooms with her infant son and his nurse.

The local gossips soon start whispering about how Helen's son Arthur bears a remarkable resemblance to her landlord, Frederick Lawrence, a friend of Gilbert's. Gilbert refuses to believe such nonsense until he goes to make his move on Helen, gets sharply knocked back and then hangs around to hear a fairly intense conversation between she and Frederick. He confronts Helen, who lets him read her diary as explanation. All is revealed: Helen is no widow but a wife on the run, attempting to prevent her child from the rakish influence of his alcoholic, adulterous father, Arthur Huntingdon.

The section of the novel dealing with Helen's life with Arthur is pretty harrowing, even for a Bronte. Arthur Huntingdon is an awful villain, and the book's pages are rife with descriptions of domestic violence, adultery, psychological bullying, and even child abuse, with Huntingdon senior force-feeding his young son vast quantities of wine and whisky in order to upset the temperance tendancies of his wife. Helen's escape, with the help of Frederick, is about far more than a woman asserting her individual rights: it is about a human being escaping complete tyranny. This is the only way to understand domestic abuse, and therefore this book should be thrown in the face of everyone defending the recent moronic actions of Chris Brown and PETA.

The book does a lot to drive home the contemporary point that, for many women, the structure of and laws surrounding marriage resulted in instability and entrapment rather than a secure environment. Until 1870, married women in England had no rights to call a divorce, hold property or petition for custody of their children. A large contrast is drawn between Helen, who has to flee her husband in the dead of night, and change her name to avoid detection, and the cuckolded Lord Lowborough, who easily divorces his wife and takes their children, leaving her destitute in France without so much as maintenance payment. Elsewhere there are numerous women unhappy in marriage: it is implied that Helen was sent to live with her aunt due to the alcoholism of her Father; Millicent is nagged into marriage and Gilbert's own mother, a wearied and bitter gossip, explicitly states, perhaps to her chagrin, that it is 'the husband's business to please himself, and [the wife's] to please him'.

The point is driven home, but not laboured. It's obvious what Bronte was trying to achieve, but the skill with which the characters are written makes the novel into much more than a feminist tract. It's a damn good story too. This is how you seek equality - by writing with passion, not unmeasured anger; by making points with daggers and not blunderbusses.


Ponden Hall, Yorkshire, the supposed model for Wildfell Hall.

Tuesday 14 February 2012

Punch and Pins


Riddley Walker is one of those books which you finish quickly but which continues to seep and creep through your life for months afterwards. It taps into something completely and utterly True. Reading it, you get a sense of something that's both ethereal and able to grab you somewhere roundabouts your gut and heart and wrench you around. Riddley Walker is about a post apocolyptic society, a twelve year old boy, nuclear holocaust, dogs, and much more - but what all of those things add up to create is a book about simply being human.

Anyway, before I explode in a fit of enthusiasm and uneloquent pretentiousness, let me back up what I say. This is Riddley going on about how he can't explain things. Just like me.

'I dont have nothing only words to put down on paper. Its so hard. Some times theres mor in the emty paper nor there is when you get the writing down on it. You try to word the big things and they tern ther backs on you. Yet youwl see stanning stoans and ther backs will talk to you.'

Basically, I signed up to Pinterest the other day, and I don't get it. I don't get Pinterest at all because I don't see the point. It just looks pretty. It doesn't explain or add to anything. Twitter is about linking stuff and sharing information quickly. Facebook is catching up with things. Flickr is about sharing stuff you've made. Pinterest just seems to be telling other people what nice things you like. Creating an image through the creations of other people.

Although basically that's what lots of artists, and ordinary people,  have been doing for centuries, stealing bits of things, magpie like, and stuffing them together to make a novel or a song or a painting or even some ridiculous outfit you wear when you're a teenager. But I still couldn't get it even in the context of that. Basically, it was only with Riddley Walker seeping around in my brain that I realised why I didn't like it.

Sometimes just images on their own can do what Riddley's stanning stoans can do and talk to us anyway. But Pinterest doesn't form any sort of coherence, even accidentally. Basically, in a very old-man style rant, I'm going to say that I feel very uneasy about Pinterest, especially as it's becoming massively popular all of a sudden. It's not even putting words down on paper. Or scrawling on it with crayon. It's just lazy, sloppy short hand for being creative. Images talk to you whether they're saying something interesting or not, but then your reaction to that should be to react, not to just go around showing them to everyone else. Otherwise your screen is just a load of pretty pictures but there's still more on the 'emty paper' around them. And that might be the case whatever write or draw or copy and paste - but you should at least try to fill it. Otherwise you're just like poor Riddley, who, for all his noble and beautiful emotion, is just a little boy with a brain poisoned by nuclear waste.

Yes, that's what I'm equating you to. Someone brain-damaged by nuclear holocaust. Please note that I am still using pinterest. 




Thursday 2 February 2012

Thoughts on Woody Guthrie

Woody Guthrie is fab.

I thought the first (much belated post) of this year should be some form of new year's resolutions, and I can't find any better than his: